This is just a quick observation. I'm hearing "too expense" way too often. I contend that's a matter of perspective.
Say, for example, that you have three positions to fill. Say that you have two choices - hire three people, each at, let's say, $3 each, or hire one person who has the knowledge and energy to do the work of those three, and could be hired for under $9. Let's do the math. In addition to saving some base salary - or even if you didn't - you'd also save on unemployment tax and health insurance benefits, as you'd only have to cover one individual instead of three.
Voila! All of a sudden, that "expensive" hire become viable, even economical. That expense hire has the ability to think, learn, and contribute in ways you've not even thought of. Do you want three followers or one leader on your staff?
Now look at the big picture. Which option do you think is really your best? I know what I'd do.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment